one is surprised of the … .peculiaridades (if not anything else) that appear on the network, the last I read are the negative calorie . Well, it is obviously not a new theory, it is a theory that emerged in the 1990s with the book Foods that Cause You to Lose Weight: the Negative Calorie Effect, of Neal D. Barnard. According to her there are food than to be processed ” need one higher calorie intake to provide.
As always, advancement that there are no negative calories, medicine, nutrition or biochemistry are felt to this theory. But to explain it in an informative manner, with negative calorie foods you would find rice, i.e. half of the Asian population would have already starved to death, apparently according to this theory the calories necessary to process the rice they are superior to those that provide. from here took the opportunity to do a little thinking and critique of a blog as a nutrition pro, to include a post like this. This blog already has enough experience and success, but I’m surprised that it includes theories such as those listed without contrast the information not the least, in the same way that I am unable to understand as it is possible that promote ” products miracles or 0 calories, when it is well known that there is no. Even if a product is free of sugars or fats (must be cookies without flour, because at the time are a cereal, they are calorie), will have protein and calories. Every time I think blogs dealing with nutrition and health require a self-regulation, although it is minimum.
Tags: negative calories, myths
