alicante, 4 March (EFE).-the affected by PIP prostheses, manufactured with industrial silicone, have lamented today “feel alone” before this problem, because the justice and health administrations maintain a “passive” approach to practices which, they claim, knew two years.
“We have got ourselves into venom into the body and nobody here does nothing.” “Who knows if the lives of hundreds of women may be at risk,” said Alexandra Narro, a young Alicante along “to many more women” of this province seek to put voice to this group.
In an interview with Efe, both Narro and Ana Amat, other affected, have explained their situation, “extrapolated” to many other women, and they have denounced the “pimping” response that many clinics, “not all”, where were this type of implants gave them when they have requested information on their interventions.
Amat has shown the two prosthetic PIP makes few dates withdrew, one of them broken and that has led to siliconomas.
“The day having a baby not give chest for fear”, said Amat, who operated in 2008 to “improve their physical appearance and regain self-esteem”.
Narro, a girl’s mother, is operates next Tuesday so they are learned two prostheses and, although the last ultrasound which became reflected that none was broken, “the fear in his body”.
“No longer a surgical intervention”, said this young woman, who wondered “why health not action now”, by making available to these women “controls, specialized care services and constant revisions”.
“To know if we have broken prostheses should do an ultrasound and fear is such that we would be all day making us one to sleep calm”, said.
In fact, do not know how to put on the bed to sleep for fear that the chest suffer pressure, are afraid to perform physical exercise or lifting weight, and in relationships they have already experienced some problems.
When these women attend clinics where they were intercepted to ask for an explanation and request their reports clinics, the answers are various but on the same line.
“You see and denounces”, “those lots – the PIP – not have come here” or “reports have been lost” are the answers that, according to these two young women, have received many affected, whose ages range from 18 to 75.
“Implanted me they poison and I have to pay to remove me these prostheses I sold as the best and proved that they are the worst”, it has denounced Amat.
Also is the case of women who do not have money to remove the prosthesis. “They are doomed to suffer, to have headaches, irritations, inflammations and psychological deterioration”, has been added.
Both Narro as Amat require that all the affected “be given an explanation of why, how and when reached these PIP market and clinics”.
But more importantly, they assert, is that public health services “act now”, because “we cannot expect to break the prosthesis”. “This requires constant monitoring to know if in the future it will have very serious consequences for our health”, noted Narro.
To the administration of Justice, this collective requests to act ex officio. “We pay to get prostheses, now have to pay to take them from us and if we want to claim you must pay to lawyers”, has regretted Amat.
