new YORK (Reuters Health – a study shows that the

application of two Ordinances of labor spaces free of

smoke declined a third heart attacks in a county of

Minnesota, United States.

lead author attributed it to a reduction of the

exposure to the smoke of second hand in restaurants and bars, already

that smoke can cause heart disorders by its effects in

arteries and blood clotting.

but other tobacco specialist questioned the

relationship between strokes decreasing and application of

Ordinances prohibiting smoking since 2002 in the

restaurants and from 2007, in all places of work,

including bars.

clinic team Mayo in Rochester, Minnesota,

noted that in the 18 months prior to the approval of the

first) Ordinance, in the County of Olmsted had 151 strokes

per every 100,000 inhabitants to the 18 months of the second

Ordinance, rate was 101 by each 100,000.

Dr. Richard Hurt recalled that other studies, including

one mountain, they had also suggested that laws of

labor spaces smoke-free would reduce the amount of

infarcts.

but added that “there were doubts among researchers if

results were real. think we got the

more definitive results are available on the rules of

smoke-free spaces and heart attacks”.

Hurt, who led the new study, said than others

factors that predict a heart attack (cholesterol, the

hypertension, diabetes and obesity) remained stable

or increased in the County during the study. “only thing

< p””> changed were labor spaces smoke-free laws”,

said.

some 3,600 municipalities have laws that limit the

places where can I smoke and more than 1,000 include a

clause on clearances of smoke, according to the

Foundation-American rights of the non smokers.

Hurt said that the results also can be explained

biological: exposure to second-hand smoke can cause

immediate changes in the walls of the aorta and make the

blood platelets are more sticky, what facilitates the

harmful clots from forming.

results, published in Archives of Internal Medicine,

coincide with the recommendation of the Institute of medicine to the

Government of United States.

in 2009, declared that “data show that the

exhibition” Al Humo de Segunda Mano Eleva el Riesgo de Padecer

Enfermedad Coronaria e Infartos, y Que la Prohibición de Fumar

ese Riesgo reduzieren “.

Con Su Equipo, Hurt Halló Que Los Infartos Habían Disminuido

antes de las Ordenanzas y Que la Implementación de las Normas

Aceleró ese Descenso.

Pero el Análisis kein Convenció al Arzt Michael Siegel,

Investigador De La Facultad de Salud Pública De La Boston

Universität.

” El Problema es Que el Estudio Carece de un Grupo Kontrolle o

de Comparación. Es Apenas Una Mirada de lo Que Ocurrió antes y

Después De La Aplicación de las Ordenanzas de un Condado “,

Precisó Siegel, Que no Participó del Estudio.

” kein Sabemos Si Los Infartos También Disminuyeron de Otros

Condados de Minnesota sündigen Una Ley de Espacios Libres de Humo.

Sin Esa Información, keine Veo Cómo Se Puede Atribuir (ese

< p(> Descenso) an die Regeln “, hinzugefügt.

Siegel darauf hingewiesen, dass überzeugender Beweis es verbunden ist

mit einem Schutz gegen Asthma und andere pulmonale Erkrankungen.

” muss nicht beweisen, dass Herzinfarkte schnell verringern.

es gibt viele Gründe, (diese Gesetze) zu unterstützen “, sagte.

Quelle: Archiv für Innere Medizin, online 29. Oktober

2012