avilés (Asturias), 16 mar ( EFE).- the candidate Forum for the Presidency of the Principality, Francisco Álvarez-Cascos, said today that his party is the only one that advocates a “public, free and excellence” health versus a PP who opts for the co-pay for finance and a PSOE whose management in this area has been based “on default”.

During a rally in the Hall of the Institute of Carreño Miranda, Álvarez-Cascos has pointed out that in a moment that is being debated on the formulas of financing of health spending his party proposes allocating to health a proper “with resources saved in other non-essential expenditure” budget.

, Has pointed out that money in Asturias “not be wastes” since the arrival to power of forum dedicated to pay health, education or social services while in other communities “is not paid to pharmacies, close outpatient or cut the salary to teachers and the functions here not”.

For the candidate for re-election, in the debate on the financing of the health the PSOE “comes out to deceive a hypocritical opinion” that, after twelve years of Government, a debt hidden 262 million euros “that referred to as displaced debt and illegal” left as an inheritance in Asturias.

“El PSOE – said – said now that it is capable of solving the problem he created and aggravated by providing health with insufficient resources”.

Helmets has taken advantage of his presence in Avilés to refer to the controversy created around the Cultural Center designed by Oscar Niemeyer and whose management snatched the regional government to the foundation that bears the name of the Brazilian architect to give it to public society recreates after various irregularities.

Now in his view, this equipment has happened which occurs initially when we miss detergent on the Moon of a car and turns on the windshield, “think it gets dirty much more and is much more murky”.

“”

According to Álvarez-Cascos, the performance of his Government has been “to lend transparency detergent to clean and prevent that four profiteers continue exploiting for their own benefit” of public funds to the Niemeyer and that they intended “to other not strictly cultural purposes”.